COLLECTOR CUSTOMS, SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE AND 2 OTHERS versus PROFESSOR MUHAMMAD KHAN
Section 17 Civil Servants (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973, Removal of Services (Special Powers) Ordinance (XVII of 2000), Preacher Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 185 (3) in front of detention by High Court. On the duty of suspected authority and civil servants from constitutional application customs authorities, the scope petitioner filed a constitutional petition against the Customs Department officials alleging that he had left his vehicle with his family on the journey. He was detained during the suspicion that the same act was smuggled to the High Court. With no legal authority for customs authorities, he was directed to pay Rs 1,000 in a day for the period of unauthorized custody. In the absence of any provision, in 1969, in connection with the payment of such compensation, the High Court was not empowered to file further such instructions to the customs authorities. In the event of any suspicion of legal importation of vehicles in the manner of exercising their powers under the Customs Act, 1969, they are required to provide validation Can be detained with competence for the purpose of and were not responsible for any disciplinary proceedings. A civil servant performing legal duties to perform his duties but no such exemption was claimed because someone committed illegal activity in his official capacity because the Government Employees Customs Authorities had the Customs Act , 1969, has no restless power. Harassment of goods of illegal origin at any time
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
