Find a Lawyer

ARBAB ALI versus STATE

Sections 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 337H (2), Sections 118 and 149 of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 11 and 16 bail, further investigation grant On his return from being charged with being a kidnapper, he filed a statement before the magistrate under Section 164, CR PC, in which he stated that no abduction was attempted by any of the abductees and he was merely It was threatened that he would be married to an unknown person, the alleged kidnapper added that he had been detained for several days; one of the abductors released him near his village. By car statement, it was not known when the object of the abduction was to marry or commit adultery, the abductors forced him to commit adultery or to marry someone else. I object to them. All such facts require further inquiry into the matter, even though the accusation of Zina's attempt to commit, which was the basis for filing an FIR, has not been held to the accused only after his arrest. Subsequently, the PPC had seven years in prison for abduction under Section 5 36 provided that, considering the delay in registering the FLR, the High Court found that it was appropriate to extend the accused to bail, in the circumstances. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Multan lawyer