Find a Lawyer

ATTAULLAH ALIAS QASIM versus STATE

Section 302 (b) / 34 and 324 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Sections 161, 164, 173 and 540 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (a) (c) of the testimony of eyewitnesses Inaccurate Poor Identification Parade Ocular Account has not been proven with the help of medical evidence. Mills / appellants were accused of non-production of criminal weapons in court, killing two men (father and son) and consequently injuring each other with firearms. The car trial court sentenced and sentenced the accused to death. The accused claimed that the prosecution did not examine the eyewitnesses, including witnesses with injured eyes. The identity parade was held in a poor manner with no identifiable value and was not presented to the court for allegedly recovering weapons from the accused, without mentioning any witnesses. An FIR was filed after the statement of alleged witnesses was filed. The FIR, though she was present at the scene of the incident, when the police arrived, did not state the purpose of her presence on the occasion that her statement under Section 164, CRPC, indicated the purpose of her presence. Which adversely affected its identity value. The Daily Mail reports that the statements of eyewitnesses were recorded by the Investigation Officer under section 161, CCPC testified that the accused from where the accused was shot did not match the seat of the deceased. ? Because the witness's statement did not confirm the cause of the injuries to the bullets at the door of the witness. immigration advocates email from Tando Adam lawyer