Find a Lawyer

ALLAH JURIO versus STATE

Definition of Articles 302 (b), 148 and 149 Evidence The benefit of the dispute between medical and oral evidence was the accusation against the accused / appellant and the accompanying accused accused that at night, he died of firearms. Committed the murder of, including Mouse and gun; The motive behind the incident was that the accused took the deceased as a car. The trial court alleged that the witnesses sentenced the trial court to light the light bulb and sentenced the accused / appellant to life imprisonment and the remaining accused were absconding, both witnesses and the complainant stated. They have identified the suspect in the electric bulblight but are being investigated, the officer discharged, saying that he did not see any light bulbs installed near the scene of the incident, which was lit by statements from prosecutors' witnesses. The sources were not endorsed or endorsed, but rather were falsified, which led to the suspicion of whether there was a power outage Whether or not the lip was light. The benefit of every suspect presented in the evidence was to extend to the accused, the wrongful identification of the perpetrators was not to be denied, and witnesses stated that the accused / appellant and the accompanying accomplice opened fire on the accused with his mouse. But medical evidence shows that the deceased was injured by a gunshot wound and had not received any bullet injury due to a dispute between medical and oral evidence, and that the dispute showed due to darkness. Unable to see the assailants with their own weapons, witnesses and investigating officer's statements found material contradictions. Oh. Statement of the prosecution's testimony attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer