Find a Lawyer

ANWAR ALI versus STATE

The value of the provisions of Sections 324, 337A (i), 452, 506/2 and 34 on the night of the incident, the three accused, including the appellant, all the armed men came to his otak / camp and complained in the presence of witnesses. Ask the complainant to either withdraw the case of his (complainant's) son's murder or to be killed; after that the suspect started firing with firearms, after which the complainant's relative located the incident Arrived at the scene and called the accused in the air. The suspect started to flee, but one of the men was captured by the complaining party with his pistol and live bullets. That one of the complaining witnesses suffered an injury to his arm. The accused / appellant was convicted by a trial court and sentenced to seven years in prison. Neither of the two sides received any fireworks injury in the crossfire and even one crime was not cleared. The firearm shot holes were not found on any wall, tree or anywhere, but one can lie but verbal evidence cannot be supported or corroborated by circumstantial evidence. A prosecutor's witness said that the injured eye witness suffered a stroke from the accused and then he was injured. The witness stabbed the accused. But none of the witnesses said the suspect was armed with the injured witness, however, it was not stated that he had beaten the accused, as the latter suffered five injuries to his person. Fracture doctor included. Evidence of the prosecution's testimony was not corroborated or corroborated by any other evidence. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Bhuawana lawyer