RAHAM HUSSAIN versus STATE
Section 13A (2) (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 89 (2) (A) (i) The definition of evidence applied to the Ordinance incident took place on the same date as Section 13A (2) of West Pakistan. (B) The Arms Ordinance, 1965, was enacted, which was later issued under the Pakistan Arms (Third Amendment) Ordinance XCVIII, 11 11 1996, 1996, under Article 89 (2) (a) (i) of the Constitution. The life of the ordinance provided was four months. Subsequently, the provisions of Section 13A of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965 were not forwarded as no ordinance was issued thereafter and it was said that the ordinance and ordinance 2 The month ended 1997, when The decision was issued four months later on 244 1998 when the provisions of Section 13A (2) (b) the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965 expired and the inactive Ordinance XCVIII of 1996 was a temporary law under which the Ordinance After the termination of the Ordinance, the proceedings and proceedings were valid till the end date, all proceedings were suspended by the NGS and no further action can be taken in pursuing the Ordinance Proceedings of this case which ends on 2 of 1997, All subsequent proceedings were non-judgmental and thus the Additional Sessions Judge was unable to pass the decision.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Khushab lawyer