Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YAKOOB versus STATE

Articles 302 (b) and 34 Criminal Code (v. 1898), Articles 342 and 103 Definition of Evidence Benefits of Doubts Lastly, the special question regarding a retroactive admission of evidence was the trial court's statement under judicial confession. I did not stand before the accused. Under the trial against Section 2 34 Cr, CC Pacific accused / appellant and co-accused were tried under Section 2 (b), PPC, which last saw the deceased in the company of the accused. had gone. That the accused / appellant confessed in court about their crime. He presented his blood-stained clothes and knife to the police. That the accused's murder was the culprit for the murder of the accused, the accused / appellant was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment during the trial, while the co-accused had to compromise with the complaining party. Was acquitted. At the time of filing an FIR or mention to the complainant in such a manner that has led to doubt in the authenticity of the witnesses' testimony, if the accused's judicial confession was true and voluntary then this charge It was enough to convict the culprit to a great extent. Under the rules of procedure and rule, confirmation of the confessional statement was necessary so that in keeping with the accused's confession, the victim received knife wounds but the Medical Officer found the victim's knife and hair wound as indicated. That confession was not a crime. Recovery witnesses confirmed by medical evidence did not say that there was a blood stain and that the face / articles were sealed at their place of recovery. law firms from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer