MUHAMMAD FAROOQ UMAR versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Sections 406, 408 and 471 of the Federal Investigation Agency Act, 1974 (VIII of 1975), Scheduled Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution Petition for fraud, fraud and embezzlement were alleged by the respondent / complainant. The petitioner has received / borrowed the disputed amount by his brother and the post-dated checks, which insulted the bank respondents, alleged that the applicant had deceived the public through fraud, fraud and fraud. Sections 406, 408 and 471, committed crimes under PPC, which was a scheduled crime of the Federal Investigation Agency Act. In 1974 neither the details of the Commission on the aforementioned cases were provided, nor were the federal and provincial government's law officers able to provide details on whether a commission or error had been committed, which led to the FI. AK will be responsible for the alleged operation. The complainant, on the basis of his repeated plea to the applicant and the alleged criminal inquiry on the basis of the complaint filed, was a dispute by his brother with no jurisdiction if any one was primarily a matter between two private parties. So the High Court allowed the constitutional petition and said that the investigation / investigation against the applicant on the basis of the complaint by the FIA was without jurisdiction and illegal and directed that the respondents be inquired. , Should refrain from inquiry and the applicant should not be called from his office
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
