Find a Lawyer

MURTAZA versus STATE

Before the arrest of sections 498 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 337A (i) (ii), 504 and 34, it was claimed by the counsel of the accused's lawyer that the accused's case was false and that he was guilty of enmity. Was involved in the background. As disclosed in the FIR. The police arrested the suspects for irreparable injury to his honor and dignity due to his arrest in association with the complaining party and according to the FIR, the accused was revealed to be equipped with bricks and charged. There was a brick blow from a piece of brick that allegedly struck the head of a brick and was confirmed by a medical officer, which led to Shuja-e-Madiyah being sentenced to five years in prison, Section 497. 1) was excluded from the prohibition contained in the CRPC. The State Counsel acknowledged the shortage of counsel for the accused and raised no objection to the grant of bail in the prediction of arrest, the accused was successful in presenting a case for confirmation of bail. It was also confirmed on the terms and conditions. immigration advocates contact from Panjgur lawyer