MUHAMMAD HASHIM versus PRESIDING OFFICER, SPECIAL BANKING COURT, SINDH
Applicants seeking to maintain Articles 199 of the Constitutional Order (XLV of 1860), Articles 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the Banks (Special Courts) Ordinance (IX of 1984), Sections 4 and 10 of the Constitution Change in the petition of the Banks (Special Courts) Ordinance, 1984, has been punished for any crime under the said offense, stating that they were granted the right to appeal under Section 10 of the Ordinance. Effective treatment of the appeal, the constitutional application was not applicable where the court otherwise had jurisdiction, one proceeding could be changed to another, The constitutional application was considered an appeal under section 10 of the Banks' Affairs (Special Courts) Ordinance, 1984, in order to provide relief to an affected person. The decision should be made accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
