Find a Lawyer

IDARA-E-TULOO-E-ISLAM THROUGH CHAIRMAN versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, SINDH

Section 99A & 99B Panel Code (XLV of 1860), section 153 booklet petition against confiscation title \ FIRK case was written by MIT Scott Hans Ghulam Ghulam Ahmed Pervez and was issued by the applicant, On this basis, the provincial government seized it, which contained material that is scandalous, destructive and threatens to hurt the feelings of Muslims. Under the notification, the leaflet was seized. Voters could find out which parts of them were objectionable, but the notification did not work with the authorized authority. Please also provide any basis for an opinion which stated in the notification that the content of the controversial leaflets that were abusive and feared to hurt the sentiment of Muslims was not enough, the provincial government should consider this leaflet wisely. And it showed the words that were capable of violating the law authority to the authority. Should not be left on the tie cue In order to take such words from the leaflet, the law requires that the notification itself should be marked as objectionable or passable, but in this case it lacks in itself. Enough because the said notification did not reveal the basis or the reason. Opinion on the opinion that was required under Section 99A, CR PC, was not sustainable under the impugned notification law; the affected notice was set aside only when permission was granted. \ n \ r \ n famous lower court advocate from Bhuawana lawyer