Find a Lawyer

MST. NASIBAN versus STATE

Section 228 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), sections 4776, 480, 481, 482 and 486 of the women who were women were convicted by the trial court under contempt of court, were punished under Section 228, PPC and Each of them was sentenced to suffer. The accused, who was sentenced to simple imprisonment for a month and a fine of Rs 1,000, was sentenced and sentenced because he allegedly interrupted the court proceedings that day when such proceedings were ongoing, the trial court said. Had prosecuted the accused at the time, as there were no allegations or requests or statements. There was a legal case against the accused. In the cases, the provisions of Section 480, CCPC were requested under which the trial court was only allowed a fine of Rs. 200 and a month imprisonment and a fine of Rs. For the appointment and preparation of proceedings, the trial court was required to comply with the provisions of section 481, CR PC, under which the opportunity should arise. The defendant was charged with explaining the situation and recording his statements, but all that was not done by the trial court was dismissed as a result of material misconduct and intolerable unlawful interference. top advocate from Chishtian lawyer