Find a Lawyer

MUMTAZ ALI versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Property Against Property Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17 (3) Bail, Further Investigation Complainant's Grant and Two Prosecutor's Witnesses, who were the complainant's brothers, filed their affidavits Had been fully charged with the commission of the crime, and in his affidavit, he did not object to bail to the accused complainant and said that he did not name the accused in the FIR Yes, but the police have released the names of the suspects. Of the two versions, the question is which version was right, there was yet to be a decision at the trial, due to the two versions, doubts were raised, the benefit of the doubt would go to the accused, the complainant and the prosecution. Due to the affidavits of the witnesses, the accused had submitted a further investigation into the crime against the accused, in which there is no reason to believe that the accused had committed a non-bailable offense. r that he was guilty of a crime that led to his death sentence or life imprisonment or that the accused was admitted on bail for up to 10 years. law websites from Hayatabad lawyer