Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMD PERVEZ ALIAS PARVEZ IQBAL versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Contempt of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 392 and 411 bail, in this case the FIR grant was filed with a delay of about one and a half months and the FIR showed only one suspicion. The complainant against the accused and another person was allegedly guilty of the joint confession before the panchayat and the identity of such joint confession was quite suspicious during the investigation two motorcycles, belonging to one complainant. And the other person, who belonged to another person, was allegedly recovered from the accused and his accomplice, but such an offender The B's memorandum does not mention the place from which such recovery was effected, leading to the impression that the alleged recovery was a joint recovery and what is identifiable is that the joint recovery was also in connection with the occupation of the accused. There was nothing available in the record to attach the alleged pistol to the export case. The challan of the case was already submitted to the trial court. After the completion of the investigation, there was no need for physical custody of the accused in the circumstances. The officer had clearly stated that no other case of the same type was registered against the accused. On request of further investigation of his crime under sub-section (2) of 5 gu 497 against the accused in the relevant police case, the CRPC was admitted on bail. pakistani advocates Shamsabad lawyer