Find a Lawyer

GHAZI versus STATE

Section 302/34 Definition of Evidence, Reduction in Complaint Although the deceased was the real brother, the other two prosecution witnesses were not directly related to the defendant or the complainant. Because they had land. Instead of being located at a distance of three square, both were free and natural witnesses, whose presence could not be doubted. On the occasion, the complainant's presence was not unnatural as his land was only 2/2 sq. Away. At the scene of the incident and he was taking care of his land along with his deceased brother, the accused was also a resident of the same town and his land was near the location where the possibility of all witnesses present on the spot could not be ruled out. And he was. The testimony of the trial court relied solely on the time, place of history and material points related to the incident. Locals say the witnesses had no motive to make false allegations in the prosecution, however, failed to prove the motive for the incident because there was no evidence in the record to prove the reasoning for the argument. It seems that the events did not happen in a planned way, but something happened that led to the immediate formation of a single commission, which was not disclosed by both parties. Sudden flare up The accused did not get repeated blows and was declared a minor injury while the co-accused. There were no explosives provided by. The deceased's immediate death, because of this incident immigration advocates email from Kasur lawyer