Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus STATE

Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 161/342 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Guarantee before arrest, complainant's grant did not speak the whole truth but he did The facts were hidden which did not make the prosecutor's story. The possibility of making false accusations against the police cannot be ruled out in order to avoid arrest for the purchase of fully valid stolen gold, the complainant later allegedly stole from robbers in front of Goldsmiths Association members. Had agreed to buy the gold, which was confirmed in writing on his business. The delay of six months in filing the FIR by the complainant without explanation was crucial which was allegedly losing about Rs 2 lakhs due to the prosecution's proceedings, only to the extent of the illegal imprisonment of the accused. Was involved in the investigation of the charges. The alleged complaint against the accused under section 342, PPC, was the initial aspect, which was a guaranteed offense. In the circumstances, the accused's bail was confirmed how to become a advocate from Toru lawyer