Find a Lawyer

MST. ZARINA FATIMA versus SYED ABDUL MUSSAWWIR SHAH

The suit for Claims and Acquisition of Articles 8 and 42 was that he had purchased an adjoining shop and cover, which he said belonged to the defendant, whom the plaintiff alleged when measuring the premises. When found, it was found that the area was 50 square feet. In the possession of the defendants on which he had built the bathroom, the plaintiff claimed that when he contacted the defendant, the matter was settled through an agreement in which the defendant, despite the defendant's assertion, claimed 50 square feet. Owned by the claimant The disputed section was not handed over for 50,750 sq ft, it filed a lawsuit for trial and trial, but the appellate court set aside the trial court's ruling and order because it Could not file a case in favor of. In the presence of witnesses, the alleged agreement was not signed by the plaintiff himself tax advocates from Digri lawyer