Find a Lawyer

REHMAT ALI versus ABDUL HAMEED

Section 42 Special Relief Act (I of 1877) Section 42 Declaration, Order and Occupation Suit For distribution of old entries based on the conversion of private entries Long-time family settlement was inherited by the three real brothers in common ancestral property. Suit property dedication was deducted because of the Martial Law Regulation 64 of 1960, a concession in land revenue was withdrawn, and the property was changed in the name of one brother, the heirs of the other two brothers. The announcement, the injunction and the acquittal brought a lawsuit that challenged the change. The trial court rejected and in the second round of litigation the appeal was dismissed, affecting the private division by the three brothers, which was approved in 1879, and the objection was that the aforesaid amendment was in accordance with the law. Was not done because no distribution source was removed. That was mandatory, and that this joint PR was not established by the document all the brothers were split and the defendant's proposal was granted a suit, although the mutation was approved by the Revenue Officer. The analogy was not linked but the entry was not challenged for a long time, and it was alleged that the parties had not committed any fraud or misrepresentation. Oral entry into the family settlement was made, such a division and settlement process were carried out on the outcome of the harmony. advocate from Talagang lawyer