Find a Lawyer

AMEER ALI versus STATE

The benefit of the doubt as defined in Sections 302 (b), 109 and 34 of the evidence was last seen with additional judicial confession. The accused was last seen with the accused / appellant and filed an FIR against the accused and the accused. Was filed because the FIR alleged that the accused and the co-accused killed the accused on charges of having illicit relations with the sister of the accused trial court while acquitting the participant, punishing and imprisoning the accused. Sentenced, it was an unexpected event and it is likely that the accused was involved in the case. The suspicion could not be ruled out that the prosecutor's evidence should not be appreciated and analyzed in separate pieces, but his credibility should be decided as well because of the extra-judicial confession made by the accomplices. All the witnesses were denied by the trial court Medical evidence was not available. Recovery of blood stained dagger from the accused / appellant to the real culprit cannot be used as corroborative evidence for reasons; previously the recovered arms were not sent to the Chemical Examiner so it was not established The weapon has been stained with human blood. Secondly, no reason was given for not submitting a weapon for chemical examination and third, no independent witness was produced during the trial, which allegedly resulted in the dagger motorcycle being recovered on the accused's notice. The trial court was not presented to support the recovery and the recovery was not endorsed by any side. Independent witnesses last seen proof of evidence ask a advocate free from Kundina lawyer