Find a Lawyer

I.T.AS. NOS.6691/LB TO 6695/LB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 31ST AUGUST, 2006. versus I.T.AS. NOS.6691/LB TO 6695/LB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 31ST AUGUST, 2006.

Appeal Tribunal amending jurisdiction over the inspection of Additional Commissioner Scope ACC under section 66A and 134 of the Inquiry Ordinance 1979, the entire proceeding commenced under section 66A of the Additional Commissioner for the relevant assessment years. The matter was examined by inspection. The Assessing Authority had no "jurisdiction" to consider the provisions of Section 66A of the Invoice Tax Ordinance 1979, in which case the Assisi's position is to review a particular case before taking further legal action in this matter. Had to get jurisdiction over. Additional Commissioner inspecting the proceedings under Section 66A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, shall have the jurisdiction to review the matter for review by CBR under section 5 (1) (c) of the Ordinance. In the absence of such an order, the proceedings under section 66A of the CBR, Ordinance will be void. The Law Assessee further asserts that, through any forum, the jurisdiction over or beyond the jurisdiction Any decree of misconduct was passed, then the Supreme Court ruled that such decisions had no jurisdiction and no law. And dismissed them in the eyes of the law. Considered in the general understanding, the term was a large and comprehensive import and would accept all kinds of judicial proceedings. It was a legal right, power or authority by which the courts and judges seriously consider and decide cases the In the present case the decision of a matter under section 66A of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 advocate from Chak 4 b c lawyer