Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus STATE

Defining the evidence of section 9 (c), the reduction in sentence did not challenge the sentence filed in the trial court against him, but he only requested to reduce his sentence while the accused was detained. While two kilograms of hashish had and reports. Chemical Examiner Positive Recovery Factor was proved by two prosecution witnesses who made consistent statements, saying that recovery witnesses are civil servants and obviously there is no background of ill will or bitterness among such public servants and defendants. In order to falsify the witnesses. The accused involved in such a case was justified in not challenging his conviction in these circumstances, however, there was no history of involvement in drug-related crimes before the trial was registered, the accused, who Was a employee in a hotel, did not feel financially relieved in life, which shows filing an appeal from a jail rat by a private lawyer even before the trial court could not afford a private lawyer accused of drugs. The seller was not and it could only be a push or a career in which the accused spent about four to four years in prison. In view of the special circumstances of the case, the trial court dismissed the defendant's appeal to the extent of his sentence, but he was allowed to the extent of the sentence he was already undergoing and His sentence was reduced. The payment of fines was also set aside and the accused was ordered released criminal advocate from Kundina lawyer