Find a Lawyer

SYED HAIDER ALI SHAH versus STATE

Further investigation against the accused in section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 148 and 149 of the accused was that he picked up Lalcara along with his accomplices and during that time. As a reckless firing victim. The victim's case was similar to that of one of the co-accused, who was similarly charged and was granted bail. The firearm was set on fire by the co-accused. Was. Injury to the left thigh of the prosecutor's witness, while the co-accused alleged that the injury to the prosecutor's witness was self-inflicted and that it should be double-checked that the injured person was allegedly injured by the injury. The fall was declared under 7 337. F (iii), the PPC, which sentenced the convict to a maximum of three years, was not charged with the co-accused saying that he had ever hurt any of the casualties. ? The guilty plea against the co-accused was to be entered into a trial case against the non-participating company, in the circumstances further investigation under the meaning of section 497 (2), the PC accused was admitted on bail in the circumstances. online advocate from Chak 46 lawyer