Find a Lawyer

HASSAN RAZA ALIAS TAIDI versus STATE

Definition of the record of the evidence in Sections 9 and (c) shows that the recovered drug substance was never shown as a case property nor was it shown to the accused during its statement under section 342. Was, in the course of the CRPC trial, non-production of recovered substances in the court, fatal to the litigation case which was taken as a sample and sent to the Chemical Examiner for analysis, The Examiner's report was found to be intoxicating and was placed before the accused during statements made under CR 5 342, CR. The PC, who brought the accused under the Control of Narcotic Materials Act 1997, was convicted under Section 9 (A), CRPC of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act 1997, but their sentences were reduced. Had been RI for one year. In addition, a fine of Rs immigration advocate from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer