SANA ULLAH versus STATE
Appreciating the Sections 302 (b) and 302 (c) evidence revealed a 12-hour extraordinary delay in filing an FIR because the trial court's challenge to the six co-defendants was not challenged by the state or the complainant. What was The complaining party failed to produce any documentary evidence to prove its occupation of the land, and on the other hand, any aggression by the accused accused successfully proved the occupation of the said land, where the incident took place. It was However, the charge was attributed to the accused, which caused the slaughter of the deceased Pulia's left arm and both bones of the defendant's right to defense were accepted, but he had a limit. Was exceeded because there was no one on his behalf from the accused party. Even his body was scratched, punishing the culprits under Section 2302 (b), the PPC was consequently changed to Section 2302 (c), PPC and its The death sentence was limited to ten years in Section 382B, CR PC's benefit benefit was ordered to pay compensation to the deceased's heirs in case of death, as in such cases he was rewarded. Was not given.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Leepa lawyer