Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF

Section 39 and 42 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), section 5 and the Scheduled Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), 0 VII, R 11 against the applicant's jurisdiction for the jurisdictional rejection of this case against the effect of the marriage contract Submitted. The hypothetical, fabricated, between the respondent's respondent and the defendant's daughter may be declared to be fraudulent and with no effect on their rights, the respondent filed a case and raised the initial objection that thereafter Applicant has no reason to file a trial case. Creating a preliminary issue related to the cause of action, the appeal against the trial court's decision was dismissed, by the appellate court to resolve the dispute between husband and wife 4 if If any part of the married couple causes a dispute in his or her marriage, such cases will certainly be established before the courts by the exclusive jurisdiction and they are not retained by the citizen. Can keep The suit, but where such relief was claimed by someone other than the husband or wife, shall be decided by the final jurisdiction in this case, the entertainment, the verdict, the verdict, and the civil court, The present case was heard by the civil court and the petitioners had filed correctly. Similarly, the document was filed for judgment and he feared that if left untreated, it could cause serious injury. Under the circumstances, the suit can be retained under 5 of the Special Relief Act, 1877, under which both courts will lose competence. online advocate from Naukot lawyer