Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus MUHAMMAD SHAFI

Section 9, 114, 115 and A XLI, R 1 The dismissal of the review petition for not submitting a certified copy of the revision order on the judgment was the petitioner's position that the copy of the Duty Sheet was not prepared by the trial court, Was therefore not available. The application for review cannot be dismissed on the objection raised by the office as the review petition was timely filed under which the High Court was empowered under Section 115 CPC to dismiss any case. To summon the record, Section 115 CPC has been requested by Prodiso to submit copies of it. Contrary to the claims of the subordinate court, the documents and the section 96 CPC, which was read with the OLLI, the R1CPC, there was no mandate to file a copy of the decree which was the only objection I came forward who was not guaranteed by law and added that the record that the order was not prepared which was approved by the High Court, dismissing the request for review and separated from office. The request for review was allowed before any available bench was granted best law firms from Battagram lawyer