COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, FAISALABAD ZONE, FAISALABAD versus DR. BASHIR AHMED
Section 31 (1) (c) and 136 Income Tax Depreciation Asset Benefit Assety rented its hospital with furniture and professional equipments and claimed depreciation on its property. Refused to rule out any reduction, as Assessie claimed that the property that was not in use by the Assessment Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal of the Assisi and allowed the assessing officer to retire. Guided endorsement estimating its revenues through three sources namely salary, private practice and its With the amount of the lease's Hospital announced. Revenue questioned the law regarding its property rental income in such a way that it appears that the authorities themselves were confused and were not sure that the rental income would be treated with it. Should be directed to the officer assessing the income from the property. Deprivation, questions related to the relevant provisions of the law were not raised as questions arose out of the Tribunal's order, therefore, the High Court refused to respond to the same appeal \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
