COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, COMPANIES ZONE-III, LAHORE versus MESSRS IDARA-I-KISSAN, LAHORE
Section 136 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1981, Rr 10 and 15 Return of the Memorandum of Appeal Scope Fence may return it to the appellant, which is not prepared by the authority in accordance with the provisions of R10 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules. was done. In 1981, the tribunal dismissed the appeal as ambiguous and was not in accordance with the rules taken by the authorities. If the appeal of the memorandum is not as per the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules 1981, it should be returned. It indicated to the appellant that the registrar had the option to either fix the appeal before the bench or return it to the appellant to re-enter the appeal after the rule was brought, according to the authorities. Whether or not an appeal was filed in accordance with the rules. The appeal was settled before the bench and the results of the dismissal or dismissal were met because the rules did not agree with the registrar. O Return the appeal and if it is not returned, it appears before the Tribunal Powers for hearing under R15 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules 1981; the Registrar does not have to return the appeal to the Tribunal. The appeal was not made on the grounds that those who comply with the rules, in accordance with the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, did not find any illegal interference or weakness, but the appeal was rejected by the High Court. Had just deleted the situation.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer