Find a Lawyer

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS versus MESSRS MEDIA NETWORK

Sections 59 and 59 (1A) Self Assessment Scheme, (2002 2003), paragraphs 9 and 10 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 25 The selection of complete audit cases The issuance of policy guidelines before the introduction of a rational self-assessment scheme, (2002) 2003), the Regional Commissioners of Income Tax resent the inquiries in the selection of their cases for total audit; such an order presented by the Income Tax Authorities was raised by the High Court Plaintiffs that the policy. The directive was not illegal. There was no need for section 59 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, either before or concurrently with the implementation of the Self Assessment Scheme endorsement, or the ordinance for the issuance of instructions before or in addition to There was no other clause. With this scheme regarding the provisions of section 59 (1A) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, there would be disappointment if the income taxpayers were informed. Again, the possibility of widespread tax evasion under the scheme cannot be ruled out if these cases or categories of individuals will be selected for total audit. The original description was required to be entered. As far as possible, the previous publication of the guideline for all tax evaders must have been grassy day as they would know that their income tax authorities worked in all fours until their cases were selected or investigated. Section 59 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, and the Self Assessment Scheme and their powers or powers were not misused, the objection to the temporary or final selection of cases for the total audit was not sustainable, for the selection of cases by the Regional Commissioners. Directions for property advocates from Pir Mahal lawyer