Find a Lawyer

KHAWAJA MUHAMMAD SALEEM versus HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENTOF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY HOME, LAHORE

Sections 3 and 6 of the West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Act (VI of 1959), in advance of private private schools and colleges (take-over) regulation, 1972 (MLR 118), by the arbitrator requesting the rent of the private school building The first Lotus Standby Mother Appellant was running. A school located in the controversial building, which was built nationally under the implementation of Martial Law Regulation No. 118, was sought by the authorities in 1977, on the petition filed under Section 6 of the West Pakistan Request. The rent was affected by the Intangible Property (Temporary Powers) Act, 1956, and the District Judge, who sought to increase the rent, rejected the request to act as arbitrator. Authorities said that the appellants sold the property in 1996, so they had no locksmiths to apply. The mediation accuracy of any building used to provide education could not be demanded Section 3 of the acquisition of the West Pakistan Real Estate Act 1956, therefore, the basic order of acquisition was illegal and all proceedings thereafter. Not legally eligible, whose property was taken under Martial Law Regulation No. I18, they were given the option to file adjustment petitions under West Pakistan. The Civil Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959, was thus fully applicable to all provisions of the ordinance; the property's rent-related provisions were also transferred through an agreement with another person, who moved the house. Was forcibly taken over and the appellants surrendered all. This person must appeal to their rights in the property, therefore famous high court advocate from Amangarh lawyer