Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YAR versus UMAR HAYAT

Article 78 The Punjab Pre-Emission Act (IX of 1991), Section 13 and 31 documents are kept on record while not preparing the objection to the confession at the time of its preparation The plaintiff had earlier filed a vacancy claim but was dismissed. Appeal was granted that the plaintiff had failed to prove the service of the notice of propaganda in accordance with the law as the dissenting records of the exhibits / documents called the dissenting notice were actually obtained by the notice, postal receipt and ID card without the defendant's objection. I was presented with the objection to the confession while preparing the documentation on the failure record Section 31, the Punjab Pre aympty final notice under the 1991 Act, will be considered if it is shown to the public if it has been enough. Was not specifically sent to the seller Wendy had the obligation to prove to the plaintiff that he was unable to produce oral or documentary evidence in connection with which the plaintiff was already aware of the disputed sale, Therefore, he can argue against the plaintiff who was neither a party nor testifies of a sale agreement in the affidavit that he knew it. female advocates from Laliah lawyer