MUHAMMAD TARIQ versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Complainants of the Complaint Claims against Section 153 and 170 Refunds, Refusal of Refunds alleged that they had filed petitions with the Taxation Officer for fixed refunds, but not 45 days. In the stipulated period, no action was taken by him and said that the tax officer's act had fallen. Within the definition of malpractice and stability, the complainant had requested that an inquiry be made into the matter and directed the taxation officer to issue a refund voucher. The department also said that the complainant, who received the income from the labor contract and filed the return claim, should not file a refund request and that the absence of any request by the complainants. In the past, the 45-day legal deadline for approving refund orders was not met, and complaints that are beyond any qualification can be dismissed. The officer, who filed on the tax receipt format, avoided resolving the questions raised in the case, it was estimated that the complainants filed refund requests which were not addressed by the tax officer. In this case, due to the inactivity of the tax officer in this case, the Ombudsman recommended that the concerned tax officer should be advised as per the law to determine and issue a refund due to the complainants.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
