Find a Lawyer

FATEH MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Section 497 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10 and 16 bail, grant of twelve days delay in filing FIR, did not specify the complainant's spouse, Was kidnapped with a co-accused. For the purpose of committing the crime of adultery, the police did not examine the medical to prove the crime of adultery. The alleged kidnapper filed a divorce dissolution case and filed for divorce from the complainant, the challan was presented in court and only two were statements of the prosecution witnesses. There is no possibility of trial in the near future, the accused, who has been behind bars for the past four years, cannot be detained indefinitely in judicial closure, it has been alleged that This offense was not committed under The prohibition clause of section 497, which has already been granted bail to the CCPC co-accused, was fully applicable to the facts of the rule and the bail was granted to the accused as a result of the trial. Was acknowledged advocate for immigration from Kot Addu lawyer