NOOR SAMAND versus STATE
The accused's grant was not named in the section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), sections 302, 452, 148 and 149 bail, but later he was included as the accused on the complainant's supplementary statement. Subsequent statements did not disclose how the complainant acted to ascertain the name of the accused, when in fact he did not disclose the accused's name in the FIR; It could have been that he had committed a crime, so there was no convincing evidence as to his crime. The extra-judicial confession available against the accused was the weakest evidence that the accused, who was declared innocent by the police, had no recourse to his recovery. He was in jail since his arrest and has been arrested for the purpose of investigating the police. Was not needed. Useful purpose, under the circumstances, will be used to put the accused behind bars for an indefinite period, the accused was admitted into bail, under conditions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from North Wazirstan lawyer
