Find a Lawyer

SHAH MUHAMMAD versus KHURSHID ALAM

OI, R10 and Section 12 (2) of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), Sections 8 and 42 are binding only on the person who is the party to which the plaintiff declares and seizes the request. Has sued for being the owner of this case. The defendant's predecessor, who owned the suit house, because the licensors refused to vacate the suit, other legal heirs of the victim's predecessor claimed that he was the successor as well as the possession of the plaintiff. I am The former prosecutor died but was not enforced as a party and, therefore, his sanction in the former litigation was not binding, the suit was dismissed, the question whether the appeal was granted The subsequent case was barred under section 12 (2), the legal heirs of the deceased CPC were not executed in the case which was filed only against their brother defendant. Did not have this decree bound and therefore, by putting aside this decree, they may refuse the decision that it was not binding on them because they were subject to Section 12 (2) Claimant did not, PC was taken by order of the appeal in the case where misrepresentation or fraud and abuse. Jurisdiction but no such deputy was designated before the judgment and decree and this order only binds the person who is the party in which any interest in the property of the deceased predecessor, Had collectively transferred its legal inheritance, therefore, this decree could be enforced. To the extent of its portion against the defendant but to the possession of the deceased's legal heirs famous supreme court advocate from Hub Chowki lawyer