Find a Lawyer

S.T. APPEAL NO. 1208 OF 1999, DECIDED ON 24TH OCTOBER, 2000. versus S.T. APPEAL NO. 1208 OF 1999, DECIDED ON 24TH OCTOBER, 2000.

Sixth Schedule, Sections 3 (iv), Sections 65, 33, 34 and 36 (2) of the Customs Act (IV 1969), Section 31A Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, Part II, Chapter 1 and Article 25 Section RO 674 (I) ) / 97, dated 29 8 1997 Section RO 51 (I) / 96, dated 16 1 1996 Customs General Order 4 1995, PCT 1901 1010 Exemption tax period from January 1998 to March, 1998 for nutritional products The additional taxes and penalties imposed on the imported sales tax were imposed on the basis that there was no sales tax exemption available under the Sixth Schedule or notification, in lieu of the alternative to the Sixth Schedule, the Government had adopted similar products. Exemption under Section 65 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 Was granted. Appellant's refusal to exempt a similar product from a company even though the appellant in a similar situation was discriminated against, but the appellant for a limited period from the date of the issuance of the withdrawal notification. Letters of credit and contracts were finalized earlier. Or it was denied that contracts with foreign suppliers were not finalized before the sudden release of the withdrawal notification, despite the fact that the period involved was far longer than the appeal of the appellant. Punishment was allowed and extra tax was sent and the Appellate Tribunal was instructed to return the milk preparation for children and theft under PTC 1901 1010. Recalculate Amount top advocate from Karachi lawyer