Find a Lawyer

DR. MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE CHAUDHRY versus DISTRICT REGISTRAR/DISTRICT COLLECTOR, OKARA

Section 27 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), Section 42A of the Stamp Duty, under section 27A of the Stamp Act, 1899, notified of the stamp duty on the registration of the gift deed executed by the father in favor of his son. Was in relation to payment. On the basis of the documents of the schedule of rates issued by the District Collector for the purposes of stamp duty on the Documents, the Plaintiffs raised by the Plaintiffs that when there was no gift under Section 27A of the Stamp Act, 1899 Yes, when the gift work was presented. The notification of accuracy registered under section 27A of the Stamp Act, 1899, had to be formalized in various ways, including publication in the Official Gazette, when the gift process was implemented, under section 27A of the Stamp Act. No valid notification was issued. The notification was not constituted under section 27A of the Stamp Act, 1877, depending on the sub-registrar, and the decisions passed by the trial court and the appellate court were later set aside on being lawful and The plaintiffs' case was decided in their favor best law firm from Khair Pur Mir lawyer