Find a Lawyer

SHERAZ KHAN versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) / evidence 34 The testimony of the eyewitness was the father and real brother of the deceased witness and his presence was the natural complainant, the deceased's father, the immediate FIR filed witnesses have no enmity with the accused And fully support their statements. Contradictions in statements of medical evidence witnesses such as the defense / defendants said were inconclusive because the evidence was to be thoroughly read and a minor dispute was made between the accused and the victim in isolation, but the next day the accused without provocation. One 12-bore gun shot killed the victim. There is no mitigating circumstance in favor of the accusation that the co-accused was not assisted by eyewitnesses whose hearing evidence proved that the trial court did not face any weakness. Or the prosecution had, beyond doubt, proved its case against the accused, the accused being convicted under Section 2302 (b), the PPC was intact and the death sentence confirmed. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Khangarh lawyer