Find a Lawyer

ABDULLAH SHAIKH versus STATE

The testimony of section 302 (b) of the testimony was the benefit of doubt only to the witnesses complainant who did not state in one of the FIRs that the victim was strangled to death, while on the other side his The statement was also rejected by two other witnesses. In its statement, it is stated that the accused had struck the deceased's throat simultaneously with the barrel bars of the useless gate, while in the FIR there was no mention of the victim's throat. The sentence against the accused can be safely registered. Accumulation of the same witness created the same superficial confidence and the complainant did not face any weakness or instability, in the present case he was found to be vulnerable and depended securely for the conviction of the accused. The evidence presented by a single prosecution in this case could not be used to take the suspect into question. Admittedly, the suspicion available in the evidence of the prosecution was set aside by the trial court's judgment and sentence passed against the accused, and accordingly he was acquitted and accordingly released. ? power of attorney advocate Tall lawyer