I.T.AS. NOS. 124/KB TO 126/KB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 4TH MARCH, 2006. versus I.T.AS. NOS. 124/KB TO 126/KB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 4TH MARCH, 2006.
Sections 52, 86, 50 and 2 (16) (BB) Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), Section 153 (9) CBR Circular Letter C No. 1 (17) WHT / 91 PT, dated 29 8 2002. Liability of the Failure as a Company Under Section 2 (16) (bb) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Section 52/86 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Was started to deal with Assisi. The following authorities have made a mistake in keeping the Appellant as a public company because it was not established by law or under this law since in the case of a company as a trustee, The condition was that it should be made. Under the law the justification under this law was neither assessed by the special legislative act nor under any law which was beyond the scope of appreciation and could not be termed as a company order of both officers. , Because by default the scissors were held to a scissor. As appellate tribunal vacant ECC was not required to be tax deducted as provided under section 50 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, the trust is not a company
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
