Find a Lawyer

RIZWAN ULLAH versus STATE

Articles 302 (b) (c), 324 and 337f (v) appreciating the evidence, the report of the reduction in the case was immediately reported to the police, four of the six accused were acquitted by the trial court, the complainant's father And the prosecution's second witness was the brother of the deceased and the presence of both on the occasion proved by the prosecution that the prosecutor's witness / brother of the victim was severely injured on his left leg and there was no previous rivalry between the parties. One party knew the other case did not include any false identification in the mitigation situation, however, there were cases such as cross-examination visits. The complainant said that before the incident he was not present and was told about the earlier incident with his deceased son. This fact was either not mentioned in the FIR or no crime was cleared by chance before the trial court, no firearm expert was reported. While retaining the conviction under the FA Single Shot Section 30302 (b), PPC, his death sentence was reduced to life imprisonment with the benefit of Section 238BB, CCPC co-accused, The man, who was armed with a gun, fired a shot that struck his leg. Because of the prosecution's testimony and its fracture, the convicts were properly convicted under Sections 324 and 337F (v), PPC, but could not be prosecuted under Section 302 (c), PPC. Under Section 302 (c), PPC, the conviction of the accused was kept separate. But it was punished under sections 324 and 337 f (v), PPC immigration advocates contact from Kamra lawyer