S.T.A. NO.232/LB OF 2004, DECIDED ON 1ST APRIL, 2006. versus S.T.A. NO.232/LB OF 2004, DECIDED ON 1ST APRIL, 2006.
In Section 46, the appeal for more than two years of revenue delay was contended by the Play-offs Revenue that the relevant file was moved to the wrong place due to transfer of office to another and during such period There was a repeated transfer of the officers concerned. No other ordinary person will be given preferential treatment against a common man. The affidavit attached to the petition for condolences was declared unreasonable, which, in the eyes of the law, cannot be considered an affidavit. The tax was not such an act of negligence and negligence was exempt due to time restriction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Usta Mohammad lawyer
