Find a Lawyer

RAO MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus STATE

Sections 497 (5) and 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 337 F (v), 34 and 109 cancellation of bail prior to arrest, the alleged incident in connection with the application for the names of the accused. The trial court had discussed all aspects of the case while granting bail to the accused, presenting them 20 days after being held; both of the prosecution witnesses were very close to the complainant, and the accused were involved in other criminal cases. There was no specific basis for the cancellation of the bail prior to the arrest, especially when the prosecution's story surfaced. Doubt that nothing could be recovered from the accused, who was accused of persistence in the plea phase, was always considered a double-edged weapon, and if the accused wanted to do so because of political enmity. They may be the cause of false accusations. In this case, even if the freedom of citizens could not be curtailed under mere allegations, the key threat to the cancellation of bail was quite different. Compared to the grant of bail and it was not the complainant's case that the accused had misused the bail discount, the request for cancellation of the bail was dismissed, in the circumstances solicitors from Sanjwal lawyer