Section 9 (c) Testimony of Evidence It was not credible for the police to leave the accused escaping articles in successive raids; after the three raids escaped, there would be no immediate action on the part of the residential house which the police would Give a clear indication. The impact of his arrest was not recovered by one of the acquittal witnesses, the other acquittal witness contradicted the prosecution case as stated in the FIR that at the time of the raid and the incident the police officer was allegedly involved. As the drug was recovered which was not brought to trial. And there was no reason for her absence to be available on the record. In the absence of any evidence of the aforesaid police officer's absence, secondary evidence was not valid under the law to prove the complaint and the accused's recovery memo was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
