Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUNIS versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324 and 34 bail, further investigation was empty-handed during the alleged incident of the accused and was alleged to have caused any injury to any person. Was not reached, according to the FIR, on the matter. In addition to the responsibility to carry the firearm, the accused was not directly involved in the FIR's question about sharing a common intention with the co-accused, and for the alleged crimes by his accomplices. There were also questions about the supposed liability. Although further investigation into the circumstances has already begun, the trial will not have any irreparable barrier to passing the accused's bail, which was found by the court in the previous investigation. Over the last five years and no further progress has been made in the trial because only the statements of the five prosecution witnesses were recorded so far by the trial court, while the prosecutor had just presented sixteen other witnesses in the witnesses' calendar. What remained to be done, such a prolonged period of imprisonment before the conviction, if any, was proved by the High Court that the accused had been admitted in the case. Guaranteed, in the circumstances attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Chunian lawyer