MUHAMMAD ALI versus WAPDA THROUGH CHAIRMAN, WAPDA HOUSE LAHORE
Sections 24, 24A, 26 and 26 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), the declaration of the plaintiff's case for damages for the notice of section 42 suit declarations and damages were simultaneously dismissed, after the confession. The notice was issued after the inspection before the plaintiff's criminal case was decided before the plaintiff's complaint was dismissed; the opposition adopted by the courts below was inconsistent with the evidence on record and was not in legal form. The defendant was tried to prove that he was the plaintiff. The decisions of the courts below, which are not legally compatible, were not sustained in law, the suit of the plaintiff was ordered in the circumstances but no damages were awarded. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
