WASEEM GUL versus RANA GHULAM RASOOL
Section Contract Contract Contract Act (72 IX of 19072), Section 213 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), O VII, R 2 Q. Shahid (10 of 1984), Article, 102 The plaintiff contributed to his case for sanction of accounts. I was charged with verbal extension and the trial of the plea of accounts was set at trial, the trial against the trial was set up. The plaintiff's integrity courts were not under any obligation to enter into a new agreement. Both courts assumed that the evidence presented by the plaintiff was irrelevant and that the piece of relevant evidence was corroborated by oral evidence. Was not done Such evidence cannot be judged on the errors of the other party in order to determine the extension of the partnership, and the absence of the other party does not give any right. The evidence contradicted the false statements and the appeal was accepted and the decisions and orders of the two courts were set aside.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Shangla lawyer