Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISLAM versus ABDUL BARI

In section 497 (5) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 506 (2), 337H (2), 147, 148 and 149 bail, the accused was abducted and after almost three years he Surrendered himself before the trial court. Transferring the request for bail, but he said that the request was rejected by the trial court, on the same basis the second bail application was again transferred by the accused to the same judge, who accepted his order and said that the accused's second The bail application has been approved and there is no new one released on bail. The trial court had neither available nor discussed nor discussed for the grant of bail, only after the trial did the two arguments / grounds be reconsidered. The first order was rejected. , Which was not only against all judicial principles, but was also rejected without any justification and without reference to the first order, which was a clear violation of the prescribed principle. The second bail application can be entertained only on the grounds that the first application was not available to the accused at the time of the transfer, nor was the second bail plea before the trial court on the same basis nor the second order as per the judicial standard. Apparently, the bail was granted by the trial court for illegal consideration, canceled, and the accused was remanded in judicial custody. top civil advocates from Pak Pattan Sharif lawyer