Find a Lawyer

GULZAR KHOSO versus STATE

Section 497 Determination Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 504, 109, 147, 148 and 149 bail, refusing to be charged with firing against the accused, but the presence of them at a location dealing with the weapons associate. It was revealed, who fired a single bullet with his pistol which resulted in the victim's death, he was the brother of the accused and the manner in which the murder was committed was shown by default where the accused and The three brothers, along with other co-accused, were shot dead by default. The explanation was not offered which led to the temporary theory that the accused had committed the common crime of murdering the victim, that the inmate under trial was murdered in the court premises, while in judicial custody and the accused. Not only facilitated the commission of the crime, but also facilitated the escape of the other accomplices, and was not justified. Referring to his presence in the court premises, linking it to the murder of a well-planned scheme was deemed to be a valid reason that the defendant played his part in the pre-determined murder and in the commission of the crime that came under it. Had a joint intention with other co-accused. The prohibited clause of section 497 (1) prevents the CCP from granting bail on the basis of further inquiries, alleging that he is the brother of the original accused, his case worse than one of the principal accused. Was property advocate from Kohlu lawyer