I.T.AS. NOS. 2449/LB, 2450/LB, 2452/LB, 5522/LB OF 2002 AND 2189/LB OF 2000, DECIDED ON 5TH DECEMBER versus I.T.AS. NOS. 2449/LB, 2450/LB, 2452/LB, 5522/LB OF 2002 AND 2189/LB OF 2000, DECIDED ON 5TH DECEMBER
Section 80D and Second Schedule, Part I, CL 102B Section RO No 337 (I) / 93, Dated 25 4 1993 Section RO 921 (I) / 94, Dated 229 1994 Section RO 1189 (I) / 94, dated 11 199 to the Economic Reform Act of 1994 (XII of 1992), the minimum tax deducted on the income tax of certain individuals is the minimum tax exemption on business while the profits according to the plain language of Part I And exemptions were allowed in connection with the acquisition. In the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, the Assistive Company was undoubtedly eligible for exemption under CCL 102B of Part I of the Second Schedule of Income Tax Ordinance 1979, and on section 80D of the Income Tax Ordinance Could not be suppressed. 1979, an obligation that existed before CL-120B of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Ordinance, the dispute in 1979 may also be resolved in favor of the SC in accordance with Part 102 KC-102B of the second schedule of income. Is. Opening of Part I of the Second Schedule of Income Tax Ordinance, DD of 1979, and of the Second Schedule of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
